The state funeral, which was celebrated in Huelva this year, was not only an act of recognition and a national fight for the victims of the Adamuz railway accident. Above all, there was a call for justice.
The unanimous hearing of the families summarized hija one of the mistakes: “Somos 45 families who will fight to know the truth and who has no other train”.
Those who lost everything in a tragedy like this cannot be tolerated in the institutional rhetoric, not even in the total transparency of a part of the state, which must not only be a remedy, but also a clear explanation of what happened.
The dignity of the victims formed at the funeral must be the only stimulus that guides the investigation.
For the record, it should be sufficient to resist any temptation to resort to verbal abuse to deflect attribution of responsibility, however it may be it only served to fuel citizen discontent when the authorities have to do the opposite.
So far, the government has chosen a more effective communication strategy, which instead of drowning out the light, appears to be drawing the curtains of humor.
Oscar Puente he did his best in the parliamentary seat and in the communication media. But to finally convey the relationship of the exceptional nature of the circumstances that led to the descarrilament, which does not lead to the declaration of the truth that the victims demanded.
There is nothing paranormal about the story in Adamuz. Metals are not stopped by risk or inexplicable phenomena, except by the laws of physics that maintenance must be avoided.
The reality that the tech investigation reveals is actually focused on the deficient soldier in a “hybrid” way, where the tracks from 1989 coexist with others from 2023.
This seems reasonable given that the Comisión de Investigación de Accidentes Ferroviarios (CIAF) was surprised to find that the renovation of the Madrid-Seville line was not “integral” as I would have expected.
This pronunciation You should not be a servant to the answer addressed to you by the Minister of Transport to the President of the CIAF, as the only person to claim documentation on soldiers.
Because according to the latest investigators of the investigation, the foul of the soldier of the other two appears to be the most likely hypothesis.
In such a situation, the last thing the Ministry of Transport can do is enter into a controversy with the control authorities.
The document of the minister in the derecho state subject to the obligation to provide information is not to protect the investigators, nor to embezzle them, but to facilitate every purpose, every registry of auscultación and every contract without asking for work.
It is said to be the opposite of the one who decided to refuse to release the report card of the soldier who failed Adamuz and confirmed that he will be sacked “when it comes”.
The human tragedy that caused this accident makes the use of delay manipulations unacceptable with which the government tried to avoid responsibility in previous crises such as the general apagon.
To reformulate the explanation in the hope that social indignation will subside over time would be to disrespect the memory of the perpetrators. Because, as one of his family members warned, “the satisfaction of these families does not end when the fires are put out or the news of this successful achievement is heard.”
Rail safety in Spain has inevitably deteriorated in the past. And anything that appears to be about maintenance or the possibility of a future tragedy like this has to be addressed with some information. No political excuses against the opposition, communication media or technical.
The deed this country has done to the victims of Adamuz is immense. And it will only be possible to settle it through a rigorous, independent and unreserved investigation of any kind.
Any other way that does not seek scientific truth for the sake of the victims will be a burden on the dignity of those who are dying today.
Leave a Reply