Abascal por el campo de Pablo Iglesias

If Abascal was not ordered on July 24, the fifth anniversary of the shared autonomous governments, tildando de “agrésión de Feijóo” el cuerdo con el Gobierno para el ward de 400 menasthe PP text does not include “stability” as a requirement through the annual approval of assumptions.

The people at Vox have been as political “savers” as they can be, looking for excuses to disappoint the leadership for various reasons. This saved them from having to share the dangers of Dana or fires.

This ensures that this time will not have the same effect and break it shop in Extremadura, Aragón or Castilla y León What is the cost of favoring Sánchez in order to reach the generals without the additional goal of disrupting the center-right PP hegemony?

Aznar just warned that the claim to Abascal is to perpetuate Sánchez’s “wall” to “raise” it.. He also said he would like to “see his conversations with the government” and state why they are frequent.

It is not difficult to understand because when the PP was last governed, so was Podemos. When Rajoy was hit in Pontevedra, the first phone call he received was from Pablo Iglesias. It was obvious that the number was known.

Trans la censorship proposal and two general elections 19desafío de Sánchez was a “janitor” for those who said “quitaban sen”. It was another way of calling them “salvajes”.

‘pacto del insomnio’, promoted to Tarzan and his companion to the Council of Ministers. Hello, Pablo Iglesias was in the vice president’s golden cage to enjoy big businessmen throwing cacahuetes at him in this atrium of power, which were of course the arranques at the Casa de America.

Alone it was a matter of time which will be attracted by the wind.

***

Abascal it goes, coup after coup, extrophe after extrophe, same the path that led Iglesias. With the same alpha macho arrogance. With the same verbal aggression. With the same desden he does those who do not feel like him.

To be sure, the invasion of Podemos was more dizzying. The five votes in the 2014 European elections were only one-year and on average triumphed in Congress with 69 votes and 20.6% of the vote.

I have read “overtaking” on PSOE and ready probes of the charge asking them as the first force with a target of 25%. This is what Sánchez thought could happen now with Vox: a triple conflict that would lead to a government slightly less than two-headed and allow it to hold on to Ferraz with the expectation of returning to Moncloa.

But it won’t be too short.

Abascal runs, coup after coup, extrophe after extrophe, the same way the Iglesias went. With the same alpha macho arrogance.

You were born a year before we could see the cutting of that PP in the place where Rajoy incites conservatives and liberals to run and leave their stagnation and apathy. Irrelevant for the past five years, party Abascal lived on the first convulsion thanks to the ‘process’ and reached up to 52 shots with a repeat election in 2019.

En On the 23rd it came with 33 and 12.4% but it now faces the triple threat of immigration, Sanchist corruption and deteriorating young people’s expectations. And with a local international brand, Trump’s godfather is under

Vox grows a lot from the polarization stimulated by Sánchez. This is the current uncontrollable increase in the polls, which costs both the PP and the PSOE. In Castile and León, it may exceed 20% for the first time in an autonomous city.

Even so, the right side of the door is connected to the left, Feijó’s desire to rule alone seems longer than a year ago. It’s not the same as trying to find 155 baits that you think will tend to peel on the 23rd to keep the current 137.

Most of those who criticize Feijóo accuse them of looking too far ahead to try to silence them in space, a tactic attributed to Ayusa. But his second half is installed in excess with moderation, in the manner of Moreno Bonilla.

Or whether or not the questions should be hard or soft. The very one who inoculates the Sanchista machines in Bobalicona Spain.

These are the magical paths that led to PP to the absolute mayor in Madrid and AndalusiaFeijóo adheres to the reality principle that characterizes autonomous urns. 23. she made a mistake when she left that every community was free and it cost her Moncloa.

In this week’s document, that means assuming in the first person tare “domar al salvaje”.

***

It will not be an easy task, since it is true that Abascal never even began to fantasize about “azotara until he bleeds” to anyone – like Pablo Iglesias in his mensaje o Mariló Montero – but he publicly proposed “echar a patadas” and “corr a gorrazos” in fact to the gobierno.

And no one stopped at the bars calling Sánchez himself a “sádico” and a “criminal”. from the rostrum of the congress.

But even more than their verbal abuse, the parallelism between the leaders of Vox and Podemos is reflected in the authoritarian and caudillistic flair with which they both purged their travel companions.

The same thing that Iglesias did with Sergio Pascual, Carolina Bescansa, Iñigo Errejón, Ramón Espinar or on his own Tania Sánchez, I did Abascala with Macarena Olona, ​​Espinosa de los Monteros, Rocío Monasterio, Ortega Smith or the Murcian ballet dancer Antelo.

Other executives usually curse each other. Abascal at least had the honor of knowing him cruelly: “Send direction – or you’ll be there and follow it.”

But even more than their verbal abuse, the parallelism between the leaders of Vox and Podemos is reflected in the authoritarian and caudillistic flair with which they both purged their travel companions.

It is clear that for Abascal there is no Article 6 of the Constitution, which imposes the “democratic functioning” of the parties, nor even 67, which prohibits MPs from having an “imperative mandate”.

Everyone would say that when this election cycle started a video do lomos de su montura“trap the children of the black merino in extreme dehese” he thought in his party, with no candidates in recognizable positions.

Unless, of course, the “rebaños” were their voters.

***

Abascal and his regional delegates risk less in the subordinate position of the coalition government, which exercises a strong right-wing opposition against the debilitated executive. Pablo and Irene’s predecessor had this reflection.

The obvious assumption is that this is the case I agreed with them in Spain that Vox does not exist or is reduced to a minimum. But “rebus sic stantibus”, given that it is electoral arithmetic, is better than entering autonomous executives and being empty against the preacher’s “manfutism” that numbs the trigo.

Because governing is not a grindar. No es anathematizar al enemigo. No es purgar a tus collaboradoras. Governance is negotiation, negotiation and management. You are giving up part of what you want to lose, part of what your constituents need.

Extremism does not create ideas, but ideas and liberation. No one can rule with this.

Pablo Iglesias doesn’t know what to do with power when you do. His vice-presidency was honorable and his Ministerio de Rechos Sociales irrelevant. He has not demonstrated any management skills. In practice it was a shared stone with a name and description.

Why do you remember the transformational idea? By no means. What about your heritage? Nada.

Abascal finds the same because he has no viable program for life, immigration or an economic model. And less than once you have it banished to the best heads who rode them. Your designs are now available in the diagnostic room.

His own Abascal knows this and is taking the lead in negotiations, demanding that Guardiola’s leadership in Extremadura – something he is likely to get – follow by masking his political vacancy.

Vox continues to be the party that shouts a lot and does nothing. What Abascal probably wanted would be to follow the path of conquest of power. But Spain, a member of the European Union, is not the Italy of the March on Rome.

This macho bromance who always plays in secret can’t last. Before or after, citizens will take over the mailing list and Vox’s wording will be explained as described by Podemos.

And also de Citizensprecisely so that he would not take the responsibility recommended by the ballot box when 180 strikes took place with the PSOE on April 19.

Vox continues to be the party that shouts a lot and does nothing.

When voters realize that a party is useful for boosting their leaders’ egos or satisfying their leaders’ lifestyles, they will support it.

***

Aristotle nos enseño que Virtue is the right mean between the most pernicious extremes. A balance between cowardice and fearlessness, between inaction and revolution.

Tocqueville and Hanna Arendt allegaron with empirical references that Cumulative reforms create more progress and welcome any disruption. “The spirit of the legislator must be the spirit of moderation,” wrote Montesquieu.

Moderation is not cowardice. It is not equidistance. It’s not a shin. And even less in today’s time, when it is necessary to radically defend against it.

An extremist always targets customers in social circles without even trying. The moderator has to put all the meat of reason into consideration of logic in order to move towards the silent mayor.

Pablo Iglesias, a politician with education and above-average abilities, chose the path of demagogic extremism and then continued, clinging to the intransigence of imaginary purity.

But he has moved from climbing the sky to trying to survive in the third part of the parking lot.

Who would have thought that Santiago Abascal, with the same brujula rota, with the same arrogance and ambition, with the same disdain for the matricologist, decided to follow the path of Mr. de Pulgarcito.