Looking for Miles or Bukele in Europe?

This translates into something very concrete and evident. For example, in Cuba or Nicaragua, they could find the best gallery of virtuous rulers, but in years they could not reverse anything. The same can be decided between Venezuela or Argentina.

It requires generations to be educated or at least stimulated in ability, merit and desire, which is ultimately the pinnacle of previous constitutional principles, even today until the courts decide otherwise.

In fact, as I have explained on other occasions, collectivism essentially works to implement a hegemonic cultural program, consolidate oligarchy and guarantee the loss of dignity of individuals and their transformation into a species of expansion.

And in order to achieve it, it is necessary to ensure the degradation of the public space, which guarantees that no one tall will get on the stage.

Thus it survives any relief, whether by intervention or even by democratic accident. And that, let’s face it, is difficult without the progress of the state and without growing activism and fervent militancy. Now I call it polarización.

For that, he deserves a lot of credit for what he did Bukele in El Salvador, or Miley in Argentina.

Because they decide things with clear clarity for the voters and manage their countries’ economy with orthodoxy (or at least try to deal with heredity and circumstances), they simultaneously focus on the people who can help them prosper and be safe among others, and dismantle what has destroyed them for decades.

It is exactly the opposite of what is happening in Europe todayalso in Great Britain, and what happened in the United States to the legend of this delusional revival of Chavismo.

The people of the major Western centers were machaconically bombarded with positive messages and encouragement for those who had found a safe and prosperous place in their nations. And so we are, in short, in a pre-war climate in which we cannot classify electoral processes as safe, clean and guaranteed.

“Data and evidence are, unfortunately, even if we live under a government of official lies, this magma in which all evidence is classified as false and everything as a rational index as a conspiracy theory.”

In this regard, it is enough to check or think about what happened in Romania, which is also happening in France, now in Spain, also in gerrymandering or voting with/without identification or verification in the United States. Authentic knowledge that has been systematically hidden and understood by the media and which only now intends to correct the situation, as we are recently aware with the initiative of the Chamber of Deputies.

I think the data and the evidence is unfortunately there anyway we certainly lived in the reign of official lies, in deliberate confusion. In this magma in which all evidence can be blatantly classified as lies or all rational evidence as conspiracy theories.

Ultimately, countries that have apostatized or are moving away from collectivism find themselves in a self-destructive spiral the likes of which we have never seen. While those who are concerned with restoring the stimulus of a liberal economy and democracy, the classical one and not the one in the heads of socialists disguised as liberals, prosper.

Or at least comment on the results of the shameful socialist policy, además de la instrucción en el wokismo, o como queramos lalamar.

DOS options seem to be what we are looking for citizens who yearn for freedom and they also want a better future, or at least a breathable one.

Absurd obedience to the new priests of developed collectivism, which penetrates deep into the depths of people, their families and their loved ones, requires them to show a willingness to merge with the darkest catechisms; or rebellion. And do it in an orderly manner, but with all the consequences.

*** Juan J. Gutiérrez Alonso is a professor of administrative law.