When someone acts against the moral standards of their tribe for the first time, it creates a serious psychological inconsistency. “I’m a good person but he’s X”.
This discrepancy diffuses emotional discomfort and creates guilt, shame, and anxiety. Because we all believe in good people. Including los amorales.
Especially ellos.
And to reduce this discrepancy, let’s rationalize the transgression (“it wasn’t that much”, “everyone did it”) and adjust our self-image, which cleans the ground so that future transgressions of this same taboo, or others like it, will be a little less painful.
The second transition is much less painful than the first.
And when the third, fourth, and fifth are combined, the thing has been adapted to one’s own perception of oneself to correspond to the same degree of moral truth. I’m not sure where I first used iteven at another point much more poured.
A point to which the thought of a transgressor will not sink.
But it’s always okay.
Pedro Sánchez and Begoña Gómez enter the Callao cinema in Madrid with the final statement of accusations before the film Peinado.
Pedro Sánchez he loved the PSOE primaries in 2014, he intended to love the famous 2016 federal caucus vote by placing the ballot box behind the curtain, and then he loved the 2017 primaries. They brought him back to the party’s general secretariat and a year later, in 2018, to the prime minister’s office.
I always do it with the same method. Fake votes, altering the census and using (human) immigrants to boost their results.
[Algo que, por cierto, permite plantearse una pregunta o dos sobre el verdadero objetivo de la regularización de 840.000 inmigrantes ilegales y el millón extra que llegarán de su mano. Muchos de ellos con antecedentes penales que serán borrados sin mayores preguntas por la administración del Estado en beneficio de todos los españoles que se crucen por la calle con esos ilegales regularizados].
I’ll put it another way. Sánchez should not have been PSOE Secretary General in 2014, or even in 2017, much less Prime Minister in 2018.
The cargo we arrived at, let us record, was a censorship proposal promising a moral regeneration of Spanish politics.
It was he who fell in love with three votes in his own party.
2. In parallel with the rationalization of the transition, a second interesting phenomenon arises in the horse’s head. Self-justification and reinterpretation of this transgression.
And so, in his head, this transition is explained by circumstances, necessity, or the idea that “there was no other alternative.” For example, because you were trying to avoid a big accident.
And this story (“my rival is also taking action”, “I am the only one who will face the extreme”, “what is a small act of corruption in the face of the internal corruption of the opposition?”, “Either you or chaos”) is consistent with who is the leader Psychologically justifying subsequent transgressions.
Pardoning and amnestying coup plotters is worse than punishing in Sánchez’s mind, because the former causes pain and the latter generates it.
Create a virtual professional career Begoña Gómez which was subsequently used as an “ancla” to organize a network of influence between the World Tourism Organization, the Dominican Republic and Air Europa, was justified by the idea that PP would target all women in the kitchen, which also had to pretend to be a business consultant in resilience.
Continuing to cling to the Presidency of the Government to consider all the corruption scandals that appear in them is better than the government of the PP and Vox, which will give us a plume in the caves of the world that should never have risen to the 75% of Spaniards who do not vote for them.
And so Sánchez, who was engaged in his own role, vividly saw, as a product of mere exposure with his own fault, a process of habituation to corruption, a limitation of aversive stimuli that eliminated cases by a complete psychological response to them actions that would cause extreme emotional stress in any other person.
And a widely justified criminal fear.
But Sánchez, very likely, no one can understand the reason for so much revue.
3. The third consequence of his own transgressions in the mind of Pedro Sánchez is moral license.
Because he is the benefactor of the excellence of the Spaniards, the evidence of prosperity, progress and moral light for all citizens, none of his transgressions will be able to overcome the “moral credit” accumulated by all his previous good deeds.
And so this moral credit, paradoxically generated by his previous transgressions (“He must save Spain from the ultraderecha!”), serves to justify subsequent violations of new taboos.
Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and First Vice-President and Minister of Hacienda María Jesús Montero at the government control meeting in the Congress of Diputados.
Europa Press
And for this reason, the immense moral quibbling of Pedro Sánchez (without counting his possible criminal crimes and his obvious political responsibility) only one can de-embocarate people’s transitions in the near future.
Offenses that will be greater because there is an outlet presence (and in Spain we don’t think we can stop it) and more justified in your head because the possibility of a Feijóo government with the support of Vox is being sought.
The question is… around all the taboos, rationalized to the paroxysm of his previous transgressions, he has accumulated a moral decommunal credit and surrounded by bulkrats, comrades in the descarnada troll market and devoted chroniclers of his enormous moral attributes that are not taboos Will Pedro Sánchez now be willing to break to continue saving the same kind of Spaniard?
monarchy? Constitution? Is the same situation behind me? National sovereignty? Is there a general election?
Everything is for Sánchez little sin. I wouldn’t risk a euro on the possibility that Sánchez doesn’t buy, love or get less than one of the previous five in 2027.
Leave a Reply