The European Union (EU) has been aligned with, dependent on, and subordinate to the EUA for so long that its obligations have not been able to see a path to action, a direct spin, to find out what Trump is looking for.
Donald Trump’s actions and attitudes are increasingly returning to the EU’s position of subservience to the EU and the contradictions that made it indispensable.
The public statements about the responsibility of the powers that are integrating into the EU show that on the one hand we wish to fully preserve relations with the EU in our thermos, which are solid and broken, but on the other hand we do not know how to use the radar as contempt, ruthlessness or animosity imposed on the interests of the EUA by the North American administration, which “takes care of the interests of the EUA as if without”. and hinders the political and economic objectives of the EU or others with a reconnaissance offensive.
The attitude of the princes in charge of the institutions of the EU faces Trump in dealing with incidents of inconsistency in order to maintain the subordination of the EUA, apoiando, aeitando or more or less in accordance with the decisions and possibilities of the current president of both EUAs and the interests he represents.
If Trump admits that he is acting in a self-interested and outsider role with respect to North American interests, we will also take responsibility for the EU authorities and deal with him conscientiously, agreeing to confirm these positions, setting our criteria so that we currently understand and internalize the imperative nature of the respective decorums.
And even though you know the EU will face an EU president because of the risks, your responsibility position is to accept the evil and limit yourself to the risk of harm. We believe that by showing that we must be in the good graces of a North American ally, we can try to ease the tension caused by its claims.
Given this, the EU’s obligations are immediately at odds with Trump’s claims in relation to Greece.
The security guarantee that NATO refers to as justified and the numerous crimes committed by this aggressive political-military bloc seem to have been undone.
Invoking the principles of international law, rejecting national sovereignty or rejecting the use of force in international relations will appear to contradict the positions of the EU from the EUA always that both will appear on the side of or compared to its references and criteria.
The economic, political and financial dependence that the EU is increasingly aware of next to the EUA appears to be a real force that conditions and limits the possibility of opposing the intentions announced by Trump.
EU integration does not reduce the criteria of international relations from the designation of transatlantic relations under the EUA, thereby limiting the possibility of response through the expansion of political and economic relations with other countries and regions of the world.
Politics has no good things without knowing it. Even if it is difficult for someone to meet EU obligations, they are.
Member of the European Parliament
Written without using the new spelling convention
Leave a Reply