Columns
LOS PESARES AND LOS DÍAS
It certainly provides evidence that even a handful of redeemers are convinced that Sanchism represents bold defiance of the reactionary specter that haunts Europe.
With an apocryphal quote from Quixote, Pedro Sánchez if you enjoyed this miracle when the “thief” left it two of X and Telegram, “kabalgam signal”.
And Cervantina’s legacy comes to light. The President behaves like an enraged man who, driven mad by the consequences of novel justices, has ended up fighting windmills.
“Technoligarchs” is the latest hallazg of the Moncloa guionista factor to correct the prosopopeia of the nakedness of the spent leader and the need to refine his patrimonialist conception and vitality of power.
In the building of Semillas, he entered the melancholy hole 23-J, without demasiado I tried all the sonajeras in her arsenal. And since Extremadura confirmed that the alarm artefact had dried up, it was urgent to invent a new one to keep the PSOE streets.
The leaders of the social reds, these festering groups of tyrants, ultras, pederastas, anti-vacunas and even human rights deniers, have been postulated as the perfect villain with the one who internationalizes antagonism.
Pavel Durov, founder of Telegram.
Reuters
But hallucinations keep the chips very short. Because rarely have a politician been so blatant about their poisonous moves and their weakness.
Because Sánchez always required a well-researched epic. Pathetic narrative goods that only internalize the known legion of papanatas unable to distinguish the arribista of a providential person and those who Moncloa know they can be enardecer as ready as they see their lúbricas fantasy of escarmiento to the “mighty”.
With these mimbres, el de Sánchez is an unusual case of populism: he who reproduces all their patrons except the principal, who is the community to which the caudillar is given.
What credibility can a governor, whose social base has been lost to a languid clientele of pensioners and officials, represent the role of sheriff, viewed by “Salvaje Oeste” digital?
The dramaturgy of nitrogen technobillonarios is great for a president unable to overcome parliamentary votes without begging his deudores and increasingly grounded in Brussels by a unilateral intrepidity that does not correspond to his external influence.
This is the usual tonic of Sanchism: to highlight the flags of power before the absence of real power. Replace inefficiency with efficiency, you will arrange the interpretation of a revolutionary document and at the same time guarantee undisturbedness the status quoas with the question of life or with the controversy with Israel.
El de Sánchez is not just populism without people, to populism against the people.
A type of uncertainty between illustrated despotism and demagoguery, but unusually obstinate in punishing their governments, importing (in accordance with patronage) generous contingents of foreign populations, and placing stakes in the path of national development with draconian regulations that enable the government to address the problems that have created the same.
It certainly provides evidence that even a handful of redeemers are convinced that Sanchism represents bold defiance of the reactionary specter that haunts Europe. And not the extravagant decadence that accuses the extravagant social democracies of the new millennium. This progressivism (a senile weakening of socialism) which, before renouncing the horizon of economic transformation through its hybridity with the globalist order, resorted to aggressive and antipathetic cultural reform and allowed itself to be lured with its paternalistic vocation to a regulatory softness that translates into totalitarianism.
But it must be hard for so many gafapasta politicians to assume that the discussion goes beyond the expansion of the “techno-oligarchs” No more sophisticated than “seniors with a clean dinner” with which the president started treating his supporters like morons.
Leave a Reply