“The truth is, I didn’t start preparing without ChatGPT. This phrase came in the middle of a lesson in which we discuss plagiarism, which was based on the assumptions of artificial intelligence.
Unlike the other times my students have confessed to something like this, this time it wasn’t hidden in shame until they had some pride in it. So much so that not only a few of their companions admitted to it, until they were no longer talking about the cost of using the hardware in its original version.
I tried to have a discussion about understanding what something doesn’t work well. They revived me with another lapidary phrase: “I am the first generation with the lowest IQ of our fathers”. I know the study, and if less, it seems serious. Not to my student who was somewhat influenced by her (not that he was quoting a phrase or that he was inspired by her fathers intelligence).
They confessed their methods and shared their experiences. Don’t always limit yourself to just requesting a text and submitting it quickly. Sometimes “hasta lo leían antes de entregarlo”. Not always, but occasionally they come in a few minutes before class and have to write an effective prompt in a short amount of time. The story of book versions is that in this case you can always look at the history of the form that the IA writes.
“Seriously, Professor, without Chat, you already set it up.
The sentence was repeated with all severity. The logical answer is that you should not have prepared it. I said so and slept with the girl. I also made a point about something that I hold a lot. I was not surprised that the cardiologist who has been helping me for many years would pass some of his subjects thanks to AI. The music continues.
No, I will not forget to generate any knowledge in my students. If you get it right, constant feedback will make it go away.
Last year, when I was qualified as an engineer in cybernetics, I wrote a thesis with the sonorous false title: “The computer as the detonator of the period of neo-scurantism in human history”. More than the objections to the title and content, which were admittedly taken in a very superficial form (now to be honest), it is certain that this was a concern which had been in existence for over three years. And it wasn’t a backup, they never gave me those predictions: my work has an extensive bibliography. As long as I had AI, at least not like now.
Sometimes it is written in the same space that a university professor who is able to accept bad work uses AI to calibrate it. In this form, when the cathedral begins to write something, the students do not write it and do not read it. Yes, as long as they award a qualification that, in a broad sense, confirms the professional competence of those who obtain a higher education.
Algo, undoubtedly not if it does well. And we must not only have this ready until we propose clear strategies to reverse the process. On the contrary, at least in the academic world, there will also be institutions in this case.
Leave a Reply