The novelist was born in 1950 William Faulkner accepted the Nobel Prize for Literature with a speech that advocated something simple and powerful: literature survives because it is born of “the inextinguishable human voice.” I will not survive, I say, until I win. The reason was deeply human: literature contains a soul, a capacity for compassion and sacrifice that no machine can bring.
Seven and five years later, the outlook seems less optimistic. In a recent quote from an Irish writer Colm Tóibín When asked about artificial intelligence, he answered ironically: “AI will be the end of us.“What used to seem like a romantic defense of the writer’s uniqueness – a unique, unrepeatable sensibility, shaped by experience – now, according to Toibín, begins to appear as an illusion. If you feed the machines enough material, they will learn the rhythm of sentences, the tone and structures of narrative. Quiz included, learn to imitate what we create inimitable.”
Some people guessed a European novelist Cormac McCarthy in the last pages of his novel Passengers. During his years of studying complete systems, McCarthy wrote a disturbing sentence: there will come a point when there will be nothing that cannot be simulated. That will be the world to come.
The problem is that AI can’t type. It is obvious that it can be done. The next question is: which means writing when even a machine can.
The same question leads to the emergence of other areas of intellectual work. In recent months, the term has gained popularity in the technology sector: vibration coding. The term was popularized by artificial intelligence investigators Andrej Karpathy and describe a form of programming in which the developer does not write code directly until he or she specifies the language model instructions for that type.
During programming hours, just describe the destination: creating a database, creating a web interface, implementing a small application. The model builds code, fixes bugs, and offers improvements. What used to take teams of engineers several months can now appear later.
Until recently, these tools were useful, but torpedoes. The results were unstable and required a lot of human intervention. However, its capacity has improved noticeably in recent months. Now you can create complete, designed and functional applications, albeit imperfect ones.
The potential economic impact is huge. The development of software Customization has traditionally been expensive because it involves months of work from designers, programmers, and project managers. But When AI can produce a large chunk of code in minutes, computation changes radically.
This creates another mix of excitement and anxiety in the tech industry. For one side, Many programmers have found that they can implement personal projects which previously had many complex or expensive. For others, they are also busy wondering what will happen to the thousands of employees who have already supported the industry.
Some technology companies support it artificial intelligence will create new occupations. It is possible. But anyway, I believe that these employees will be the same as the previous ones.
The stimulus is not limited to software. AI-driven automation is used to influence sectors as diverse as business, finance, architecture or business management. Each new appliance promises to increase efficiency and reduce costs, but also plants questions about the future of intellectual work.
There is a material aspect that rarely appears in technological enthusiasm. The infrastructure that supports AI systems—data centers, processing units, cloud computing—consumes vast amounts of energy, water, and precious minerals. The futuristic gloss of hidden artificial intelligence has a significant environmental undertone.
But even if we consider economics and ecology on one side, there is a deeper question: the same sense of creativity.
When it comes to art, the social reaction is clear. A work of art never reaches a final result. Part of its value lies in the history of its creation. We care about who we are, what we seek, what we dare to go beyond, what sacrifices are involved. It is important for us to imagine the writer facing a blank page, trying to find the correct sentence form.
This effort forms part of the meaning of the work.
So the inconvenience arises: Can you have the same value as the work of your creation without enough effort, can I have no conflict for anyone?
Quizá por eso some editorial empiezan to experiment sell them as “written by people”. This may seem like an anecdotal gesture, but it points to something deeper: the possibility that AI creation will turn into a kind of cultural craft.
Embargo-free technology is often held for cultural reasons. The history of the Internet offers many precedents. There was a time when blogs weren’t considered real publications, when cloud computing seemed less risky for big companies, or when e-commerce was frowned upon. Over time, all these resistances will disappear.
Some people could interact with artificial intelligence.
If the craft continues to improve, thousands of people can gain the ability to create software or produce digital content without the need for specialized technical training. Many everyday problems – cumbersome bureaucratic systems, endless manual processes, impossible to generate information – can be solved with Herramientas que no siquiera exists today.
The same technology that benefits some employees could expand the creative and technical capacity of thousands of people.
The history of innovation is full of ambivalence. Every major technological advance destroys some capabilities while creating new ones. It is difficult to predict what will happen and what will arise in its place.
In this context, Faulkner’s warning remains relevant. According to him, literature is born from “the human heart in conflict with my own thoughts”. Sometimes this conflict can never be fully automated.
The truth is that machines write, program or design better than we do. The trick is to forget that part of everything was actually deeply human.
Leave a Reply