El Cristóbal Colón, el buque de combate que Pedro Sánchez Having entered the war against Iran, it is the most modern of the Spanish Armada and, thanks to its AEGIS combat system, is one of the most advanced frigates in Europe.
The state-of-the-art AEGIS combat system is the US Navy’s equivalent of the destroyer Arleigh Burke.
The Cristóbal Colón, a name that will surely delight the pacifist izquierda to whom Sánchez minted this miracle with his “no war”, also comes with a 48-cell MK-41 vertical launcher.
This launcher is the central part of the frigate’s weapons system and can contain a combination of standard SM-2 anti-aircraft missiles and RIM-162 ESSM missiles designed against short- to medium-range supersonic strikes.
But the main characteristic of the missiles that propel Cristobal Colón is that they deploy like the others, but inside. They are implosive defensive projectiles which operate only as part of OTAN and EU “defensive operations”..
So they are peaceful missiles.
Yes, passive-aggressive missiles.
But in no case is this an unfair, fatal or thoughtless accident. They are progressive bullets.
Frigate ‘Cristóbal Colón’ de la Armada. Notes on melancholy and languid armor.
Ministry of Defence
The reality is that these missiles serve the function of liberating American capabilities so that they can be deployed in offensive operations against Iran.
On paper, irrelevant legal debates about “Marcos” and “Paraguas” aside, this is a crossroads of the US and Israeli military.
It is clear that it can be played Kungfuism from a gallinaceous flight and decide that it is not the same as a B-2 bomber burning Iranian military enclaves, that a frigate whose function is to destroy Iranian missiles.
Which, on the other hand, is obvious.
But the reality is that this frigate is a bigger piece, not exactly a smaller one, American and Israeli campaigns against the Iranian regime.
Because the war in Tehran is the same as in Cyprus, Turkey and the Emirates. And all the missiles come from the same place: Iran.
The only one with aliases es divide the papers. As on the other side, wars occur in all.
France, UK and Spain protect Iran’s security.
The United States and Israel percuten en la vanguardia.
O sea, that Pedro Sánchez does not put the king aside. Anything else, because you can’t. But help your señor. Which ex Donald Trump.
And sure. Jose Maria Aznar sent three ships to war against Iraq.
The same war that provoked the “no war” movement that Sánchez now intends to resurrect with the hope of returning his worst problems.
The director of these three beeches was Castilla. Buque Hospital.
The second was the frigate Reina Sofía, this function was protected in the Buque hospital.
The third was the fleet oiler Marqués de la Ensenada, which, as its name suggests, only carried fuel for the other two.
I want to explain it clearly so that it is understandable. The ship Pedro Sánchez sent to the Eastern Mediterranean is often more lethal than the three ships Aznar sent to the war against Iraq.
Aznar, además, consiguió the approval of the Congress of Diputados to send these items through various parliamentary resolutions. What Pedro Sánchez did not do.
If Sánchez goes before Congress, his associates will tell him “no.” The president must therefore decide whether to leave Monclau or give it to Donald Trump.
In order not to ask, Sánchez acts as an absolute monarch and leads Spain into a war that the same man said he would not want to participate in.
Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez in his comparison in the world.
Eph
Rhetorical jokes about “legal umbrellas”, “action marks” and the difference between OTAN and the United States, which is the leader and most important country in OTAN, I give to the drunkards of Moncloa who pay me not to do mockery.
But yes, I want to explain.
This morning at 8:30, half an hour before Pedro Sánchez’s performance in Moncloa, I went there Carlos Herrera en la COPE.
I normally attend the next session at 9am.
But this miércoles, Jorge Bustos I think “ask a little more and let’s comment on Pedro Sánchez’s appearance”.
As I asked.
Bustos is the text of the first person who told you when Sánchez was talking. “But if there’s no allusion to Trump’s humor, we assume that was the point of his speech: something else happened here.”
And it’s clear that something went wrong.
I went through the complaints of Donald Trump, as I say, the spokesman for the American government Karolina Leavittwere brought “high and bright” to Moncloa.
And that Sánchez has already made it.
Signed the return Margarita Robles at your meeting with the US Ambassador to Spain, Benjamin Leon JRat the headquarters of the Ministry of Defense. The script symbolism of the historical record of the Spanish cable is there for all to see.
And a little later, Karoline Leavitt confirmed this statement on her way out. The White House, knowing full well that this is a war and those involved in it, did not lie.
Mentía Pedro Sánchez. As always.
Because the frigate Cristóbal Colón, which at the beginning was only supposed to accompany the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle to the Baltic Sea, will now follow it to the coast of Crete, where it will reach within five days.
And this change of plane immediately, decided on this miracle between Trump’s threats, is what highlights Sánchez’s lie and the assumption that his intention was to involve the Spanish.
This change in the plan of the Spanish government is the one that the konvenció do Casa Blanca that Sánchez returned to, and the one that Karoline Leavitt will confirm what she confirmed.
Later excuses are just a way to justify what can anyone infer from that know el timing from hechos.
The only one who believed in Pedro Sánchez was the poor president of Iran, Masud Pezeshkianwho commended this honor to the Spanish government for its “responsible behavior” in “opposing” “flagrant violations of human rights by the United States and Israel”.
Which confirms that in Sánchez there will always be new fools waiting to join his tricks.
Above all, there will now be a long and bitter debate about the definition of “war” and the difference between “offensive operations” and “defensive operations”. Who takes care of them Zelensky that explains the difference between one and the other, and since one is “warlike” and the other “compromised with the defense of the eastern front”, I’m sure there will be laughs.
But those are rhetorical debates for others. I can tell a war when I see one, and I can also tell which side benefits one of the interlopers.
If Aznar was a war, Sánchez is too.
Rhetorical debates about definitions and nomenclatures are the talk of parlor intellectuals, but they only serve to obscure reality. To me the words are the same. I care about those who care. And they are 6,400-ton frigates capable of turning Tehran into a parking lot.
And this is why Sanchez decided that Spain would participate in the war in the only way he could: defend the military of Israel and the United States. So let’s not say anything else.
Leave a Reply