Why do I support European and Israeli intervention in Iran?

He had long wanted this intervention, even less so than his own Iranians, who spent weeks scanning the skies in the hope of seeing fighter jets to fly them against the criminal regime.

It is now necessary to monitor the evolution of Iran’s operations and reactions, who decided to carry out a coup in the Persian Gulf countries.

We were faced with two options: either regime change, which seems to be the main option, with the removal of the Supreme Leader and other leaders; The negotiations between Iran and the United States on nuclear issues and Iran’s uranium enrichment are under intense pressure.

Are you honest about these negotiations?

Was it a question of getting time for part of the mullahs regime?

Was Donald Trump better prepared for the public response to the intervention?

We know that the Iranians refuse to address the crucial issue of missiles in the negotiation cycle. At the time of the JCPOA agreement, i.e. ten years ago, only the nuclear risk was discussed.

But Iran’s military proliferation, which ojivas can get Israel if it turned into a central premise.

In parallel with these discussions, the United States took weeks to deploy a substantial military force in the Middle East: 50,000 men, two aircraft carriers, two fighter jets at sea and at air bases in the region.

In practice, it is rare to deploy this device so that it does not interfere.

How are we here?

The role of the military regime must be a strategic priority

Let’s see clearly. We demand a stable Middle East and a safer world, so the Iranian regime’s cause must be a strategic priority.

We know: it’s difficult, complicated, risky. I understand the anxiety of public opinion in this world and they are so very brutal.

If the conflict drags on, the economic consequences (cancellation of some sea routes, increase in the price of oil and gas) can be serious.

“How can we really create a good dialogue with Iran? Why haven’t they learned from history?”

In Europe, we are facing a war in Ukraine.

Leo statement of the European leaders and the President of the Republic. They helplessly provoke the necessary “des-escalation”, a return to “good dialogue”.

But can anyone really create it?

Is it because we haven’t learned from the story?

Don’t repeat past mistakes

In 1979, in the name of always engaging revolutionary romanticism, part intelligence de izquierdas creyó ver en Khomeini and in the removal of sha, abandoned by the administration Carterthe possibility of an anti-colonialist and anti-imperialist regime emerging in Iran.

In reality, a theocratic and totalitarian counter-revolution was being prepared along the way.

The alliance with the Islamists was strengthened, convinced that they were no longer a transitional force.

Fatal error. Political Islam was not a companion on the way, until the core of the project.

The Islamic Republic, also supported by the support of Western powers, was constructed methodically: eliminating its foreign allies, enslaving the democrats, reasserting control over institutions, locking down the state due to religious violence.

In 1989, when the Berlin Wall fell and democracy was apparently dawning on history, Tehran began its fateful opposition Salman Rushdie. The founding act of global Islamism, which proclaimed that religious law could encroach in any direction, including states and freedoms.

Indeed, Iran has not stopped perfecting this model, combining an apocalyptic vision and anti-Semitism, internal repression and ideological projection to the outside, has turned into one of the central poles of contemporary Islamism.

This strategy was extended through the systematic use of armed proxies, allowing the regime to export violence and destabilize states.

Iran has funded and armed Hezbollah in Lebanon, Iraqi military forces, the shantytowns in Yemen, Hamas and other Palestinian groups.

He supported the bloody regime until the end Bashar.

Their blood was involved in attacks against Westerners in the region (security, attacks against French targets and foreigners in Lebanon), but also much more.

Iran ordered a series of bombings in Paris in 1985-86, and the threat posed by Iran’s opponents around the world continues to this day.

A massacred community begging for our solidarity

The Iranians paid in blood when they rose from the black. Now you are hoping for the state intervention imprudently announced by Trump.

We meditate on the level of horror of a regime that for years massacred its own people, its youth, its women. But the repression of the last month surpasses all imaginable. More than 30,000 deaths every hour.

French snipers shot to kill protesters in dozens of cities across the country.

Regime soldiers rushed to hospitals to prevent medical treatment or injuries and attacked their own doctors.

Scores of Iranians have been standing up for weeks demanding external intervention, terrible but necessary from the pulpit as far as they are concerned, and who have been in power for years, opposed any internal resistance.

Part of the Iranian diaspora (entre ellos Reza Pahlavihijo of the sha) assures that the next day will not be the chaos of Iraq or Libya for these three thousand-year-old people of antiquity, education, worship, who seek access to freedom, who form a fully formed nation.

The end of the Islamic Republic of Iran did not mean only a change of regime in the historical context for the Iranian people. In the face of violence and obscurantism, it would also be a welcome shock, a geopolitical and ideological revolution of the first order for the Middle East and the world.

The map of the region is gradually redrawn

The map of the region is gradually redrawn. They all came with Abraham’s arrows, signed between Israel and various Arab states, between the United Arab Emirates and the Kingdom of Bahrain in the region.

Everything changed between the October 7, 2023 Hamas terrorist attacks in Israel.

Constrained by normalization negotiations with Saudi Arabia, dragged back into a war of carnage, Israel believed that its existence wanted to be at stake and that Iran was never a real consolation.

The Jewish state, engaged in war on five fronts (Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Iran), achieved important military and strategic victories.

Hezbollah’s power has deteriorated considerably. Bashar has fallen. The Islamic Republic of Iran, already weakened, has been brought to the fore by the IDF and the United States since last June for the “war of the last days”.

France must be on the side of the Iranian people

However, the Mule regime moved forward in a desperate situation for its survival. It oppresses its own people, represents a dangerous existence for Israel, supports a Putin we are happy in the war against Ukraine.

That is why I support European and Israeli intervention. It seems necessary and fair to me.

The French diplomatic position naturally tended towards reservations about any external military intervention, despite denaturalized international law that protects tyrants and condemns democraciesyou are worthy

The story is being written before our eyes. Sufro por nuestra retridada.

I hope to rise from her obscurity and take her responsibility by participating in the coalition that gives freedom to the Iranian people.

*** Manuel Valls is a former French Prime Minister.