Do this with the Supreme Court of the United States ruling that the illegality of the Orange County Mayor’s office has been ruled out Donald Trump It calls for one of the most sweeping overhauls to be undertaken by a Republican to directly attack the core of his economic and political agenda.
The court’s decision rests on the invalidity of the procedure used to execute it. An argument that is crucial rather than just a formal argument or an irrelevant technicality.
Forms are essential in a democracy. And Trump, according to the court, is additionally limited in his functions to the use of the legal emergency formula, which usurps the power to impose burdens that the EEUU Constitution commits exclusively to Congress.
If this dictum is of extraordinary importance, it is precisely because it represents express deprivation of judicial power with absolute discretion which the president intends to carry out, which clearly defines the will of the executive.
It is particularly revealing to analyze this move in light of the actual makeup of the court.
It burdens the court with a conservative mayor and three of his colleagues nominated by his own Trump, The Supreme Court maintained its independence and legal rigor because of any partisan sympathy.
To put the transcendence of that judgment into perspective a priori ideologically, after the turbines of the president on the right, we can draw an enlightened comparison: this is how the Constitutional Tribunal declared the amnesty law unconstitutional Pedro Sánchez.
Without abandoning the parallelism, a significant difference is observed in the behavior of the two guarantee courts.
While the United States Supreme Court has decisively resisted Trump’s other moves — such as banning his administration from desegregating federal units in Chicago or dismissing his charges of voter fraud — the Spanish constitution has hailed most cases in favor of the government’s case. Including the most controversial episodes, such as the amnesty or the annulment of the ERE judgment.
The judicial invalidation of much of the president’s global oranges prompts us to ponder the proposition that the United States has been turned into a decree under Trump’s mandate. Moose checks and balances The American system is proving to be much more robust and resilient than it appears.
The integrity of the former state inevitably persists when one of the farms undermines the jurisdiction of the remaining ones. The dynamic that is clearer is the disobedience that Trump gave in response to the foul, insulting the players and ensuring that he “gives them the same punishment” and that the oranges “want to follow” because he says with “very strong alternatives”.
However, given Trump’s intention to eradicate judicial checks and balances, it seems likely that this is a functional separation of powers It is the best antidote to the authoritarian impulses of populist leaders.
EEUU gave a lesson in democratic health that we must know well in our country.
Leave a Reply