Pilar Alegría: a political grieta turned into a shipwreck

The election leader promised clarity, order and a clear political idea. In fact, it served to confirm that the situation is more complex, fragmented and dangerous than many had assumed.

Pre-election surveys indicate that the People’s Party, p Jorge Azcon in front would be the most voted force.

A technical victory, but an absolute one, clearly due to the 34 shots needed to rule alone, and therefore dependent on a strong Vox.

Nadie also reflected on the huge challenge from the PSOE and the gluten-free.

And so it is.

Demasiadas reminiscencias extremeñas, but from where everything is very predictable. PP should be ready again, have a clear government strategy with a changing partner who alternately ignores or attacks.

However, the most interesting thing was again the transfer of votes from PSOE to Vox and other forces of the radical right. And we can conclude that this transfer of votes is neither unofficial nor economic. It is an expression of the crisis of representation.

This image cannot be understood deep into the vertebral part of what once happened: the socialist election campaign was ineffective and self-destructive.

Ferraza’s strategic strategy focused on the figure of an extremely fragile candidate proved to be unsettled and unfettered, without a project or a manifesto that united the real interests of the Aragonese.

Everything points to the fact that the PSOE, which was the referent and master in this matter, did not know how to conduct electoral politics. No structural organization, no activation of territorial teams, no specialized teams to enable you to support a competing candidacy.

This diagnosis has profound political implications. If the PSOE repeatedly shows itself unable to build its own, articulate and credible relationship, we are not talking about a “campaign foul”, but rather a politically existential issue: the dismissal of traditional social democratic voters.

The results of the elections in Aragon, with their clear priorities (health, public services, cost of living), undoubtedly reflect the desire before the party that you cannot translate your proposals into trust and expectation.

The 8-F, dominated by the PP-Vox dialogue before the sluggish PSOE, faced two mayoral candidacies in transit, but none proposed a profound transformation.

We turn to the experience of the accumulated weaknesses in the major parties, the crisis of leadership and the emergence of forces that benefit from discontent and resentment.

In this way, with voters who have options that reflect more identical and exclusive discussions, the PSOE rushed to the brink of a disastrous result in Aragón. Pilar Alegría like the camouflaged mask of a shipwreck.

She was probably the worst possible candidate.

Alegría participated in the election as a minister and spokesperson for the government, a dual condition that required her to forgo her own credibility to strengthen: she was a candidate (and necessary defender) of the government question, which many consider “the biggest liar in recent history”.

Alegría’s institutional experience and formal correction, transformed into a human shield rather than an Aries, condemned to an electoral viacrucia, forced to justify in an autonomous class decisions taken in Madrid and without real space to build her own profile, dissolved like the blues in the stormy sea of ​​her personal and political records.

His direct intervention was necessary Pedro Sánchez in Huesca and Teruel. About the public defense of the minister Oscar Puente in the full atmosphere of the national duel, callous and arrogant, I paid her to Alegría like a cube of blood Carrie.

Pedro Sánchez and Pilar Alegría.

Pedro Sánchez and Pilar Alegría.

When the probes confirmed the deterioration, the socialist team went into panic mode. If they improvise actions, if they multiply remedies, if delirantes whatsapps are sent.

Then you will find a list of sent messages: national managers, advisers and organic managers of the PSOE, who will additionally transmit protection and control. And as the story goes, the ugly stigma of the “Salazar case,” handled with ambiguity and corporatism, weakened the morale of the campaign.

Alegría was caught in the visceral area like a fly in a spider’s web.

The fact that the PSOE is sending her as a sacrificial candidate reveals the deep crisis of the territorial cuadros. Autonomous politics was transformed into an instrumental extension of the national system, thereby reviving electoral politics.

Furthermore, enjoying happiness is irresponsible for the system because it discourages future leaders and refutes the idea that communities are secondary scenarios. The implicit message is canceled: Aragón does not need its own project, but a ministerial delegation.

And so, above all, we are facing the retreat of the political center and the normalization of forces that feed agendas that are more irrational than pragmatic.

This is not just an Aragonese problem: it is also a symptom of what is happening in Spain. You could say “less bad than we are in Portugal”. With candidates named Seguro and Ventura, everything is better.

But we don’t have the cards you want to play, and no paracetamol is worth it. We need a general election to clear this devastated hearth.

Source

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*