In the last few months, Mr. Ricardo Salinas Pliego came in a very bad controversial call. And it is unreasonable because there is no point in refuting it: he is a man who, since 2008, owes the country a huge amount of money due to debts in the world, which today accumulates more than 30 million pesos. No room for discussion. The oligarch of Ajusca was above all a defaulter who did not meet his fiscal obligations due to corruption.
Given this, in some sectors of the press, information management has raised the possibility that this is nothing more than a case of elite henchmen, if it was tension, pressure or perhaps political persecution of governments called Cuarta Transformación against the impresario of the white man. Finally, some news AD 40 I began to suggest this in November 2025, based on an expert column by Salvador García Soto, which drew parallels between the demise of López Obrador in 2005 and the case facing Salinas Pliego.
In an open authoritarian act, whose legal and political evidence gave López Obrador a complete reason and returned him to the topic of illegitimate sound, a cloud of great imagination and careful research appeared; with the adeudo product of the desire and traffic influences of a man of famous cometer atropellos throughout Mexico. Comparing victim to victim is not only an illogical lesson, but rather a fallacy of ethics.
Even in this precarious situation, when without complicity, the management of information about the Salinista adeud, the acts of someone’s duel Aztec TVwho in his description In his obstinacy was unforgettable, indignant and revealing, the words with which he referred to people, among other things, were recorded in his adeudo, like many misogynists, “putonas del belanza” or “marranas”; or the very coprophilic and childish phrase “my bugs” has enough excess of “bañagatos”, clues that this question is more likely to be heard in the veterinary world, but it is as mysterious as it is insulting.
Well, after 18 years on the run and affected by human trafficking; and after more than two years of direct conflict with the only actor who allegedly forced him to fulfill his duties, allegedly on behalf of Cuarta Transformación, on the 30th day of the year, Salinas Pliego paid a little more than 10 million pesos to the end, on the other 18 releases, because they were abonos chiquitos, adeudo pendente.
The legal-economic dimension of the case ends here with an act of authority and justice that puts the historical tax evader in order. But the political dimension continues, because it is necessary to emphasize that there are systemic negatives that need to be paid for, and many times to write with foresight that it should be nothing and that something like this will never be paid for; the tycoon does not pay only for the stubborn mojigang, if the only logical conclusion follows: all the insults he uttered in this regard are nullified, and the final image of this act is that he was destroyed by his own irresponsibility and paid with a reptile for what I say never again pagaría.
It is no coincidence that at the same time as this balance of information from one of the main cabecils of the Mexican opposition, another revealing case would become known. And he is the chief cartoonist of the magazine ReformFrancisco Calderón, recognized on the 29th of last year also through a report in
Wait, there is nothing extra or incorrect here. If the universal idea is that everyone, regardless of their political views (or their biases), is right. Nadia has to co-opt this story and the good news is that this act of reprimanding adult mayors can actually be received by people of any political standing. There is no inconsistency between criticizing the government and accepting the idea proposed for it, for the simple reason that rights work as well and there is no choice between them.
What is really predictable, and the similarity is very critical and disturbing, is that this person has shamelessly lied about this social program for years, because without any evidence and based on his own prejudices or unhealthy desires, he shamelessly made sure that it is “divas” or “limosnas”, which are not they revive the poor and, on the contrary, are part of the program of voters and voters.
Since 2004, when he came to the attention of adult mayors in ecstasy fanatizado abrazando photos Entonces Jefe de Gobierno López Obrador; and without mentioning the euphemisms directed at this sector to always consider it a cautious clientele of the map actions of the PRD or later Morena, Calderón argued that this program is only valid if, in the worst case, only these elections are not disrupted.
Hoy, su propiaducta lo desmiente. In order to predict the clientelism of this benefit, the type is god that it is a universal derecho because the same through it and ultimately a procedure that takes place, as can be deduced, without any kind of business, obstacle or clientelistic affiliation. As a citizen among the 14.4 million people who are part of this justice program, Calderón is now the owner of beneficiaries who, with all legitimacy and correction, receive a two-month pension in recognition of their day, for paying taxes and for their wages as workers for life.
It can be assumed that having some short-term clientele when Calderón was repulsed would be an illegitimate act that would reasonably be shouted to the four winds. But it wasn’t like that. Monigotero periodicals Reform and the official voice of the drug trafficker García Luna, I can receive my pension without any objections. If it was correct, both internally and in public discourse, he was obliged to address his criticism, because the truth was that he was wrong to treat the clientele as a universally validated agenda.
It is legitimate to have some skepticism before retirement. It is legitimate that there are backlights or materials that indicate this respect. But for intellectual honesty, on a speech that is a third of the electoral map, one must always be careful that it is not simply a lie.
But the problem got worse with additional data. Calderón not only systematically lied about the alleged clientelistic use of these pensions until he made two decadent insults, in a generalized way, without being accused of any kind and with racist anathemas, to all the beneficiaries of this program.
Attacks in this respect have some things in common with the following: “focidos del belénagera”; “limosneros”, “beef meat” or “estira manos”. It’s all suggested in cartoons, where it’s usually explained by physical reasons that link skin color to economic level to label the industry as necessarily manipulable.
In the last year and throughout the year 2024 panfletero of Reform escalated its disputes against this social sector, the beneficiaries of the Bienestar programs. We remember that Marras’ character was born in February 1959 and that the pension he receives is for adults aged 65 and over; It must be inferred that this person was abandoned and receiving his pension while he persisted in his publications, lying about the alleged cronyism of the program and insulting its beneficiaries.
Therefore, the nickname must not only neutralize its own insults, but, on the contrary, must remove them. Once it achieved a universal receptor, it was better described to that extent. When this inconsistency was criticized in proper form, the guy took two steps: he looked back in his mind and considered his criticisms to be valid; or to insist upon his words, so that he may convert into all the adjectives which he uttered. The guy opted for the latter.
Worse, the justification for getting your pension is that it’s “impuestos pay”, the absurd song of egoists who believe they’re the only ones doing it (even, well, with Salinas I Pliego in the gym, the tough one). News for Señor Calderón: all beneficiaries of the program, which began five years ago, also pay taxes. The rationale for the money is restored to something like “if I get a pension, it’s a derecho and I’m a treasury insurance; but if the other income is free”. Ace ni siquiera is a simple conceptual error. This is not a simple elitist misunderstanding. Above all, it is a terrible act of narcissism.
Here, like a herd of buffaloes, various negative voices of public debate were raised in defense of the money of Garcialuna, giving them a reason, or worse, accusing them of a censorship campaign directed by Jesus Ramírez, the government or Zeus would know who would suffer the evil They organized this conspiracy against the poor cartoonist.
What is unfortunate is the little respect these voices have for the monigoter. In truth, instead of talking to her about Orwellian doublethink and narcissism—where there is no limosnero or focido nini to draw a pension from, not even a hero of the treasury—they recommended a little self-criticism. But every palm on his shoulders was an unthinking confirmation of the fact that there were insults in his person which the desorbing caricaturist Reform if he talked to me that long.
Leave a Reply