Pedro Sánchez This Tuesday launched an offensive regulation against a social elite that harbors a disturbing interventionist impulse under the rhetoric of child protection.
Average Star banning access to these platforms to those under the age of 16 is not only due to technical inefficiency, if It presupposes a clear intervention of the state in the sphere of power of the homeland.
Psychologists, paediatricians and technologists have warned that we are ahead of an attempt to “kill flies and dogs”.
Because experience with digital prohibitions shows that it is again rare on target. What follows in exchange is to give the appearance a more attractive appearance.
Turn the red light into forbidden fruit for teenagers You can’t avoid these people running into wall jumping technical requirements.
And that is why the method of pedagogy, support and parental control is what experts define as the only real option for healthy digitization.
Repressive criticism is not new in the history of the current executive.
It forms part of the paternalistic shift that we have seen in initiatives such as the “digital passport” for pornography, restrictions on smoking in expensive cars, or the requirement to ban smoking in private vehicles.
I reduce the burden of health insurance, The government is careful to insist on the extent of the measureswhich allows the state to enter the workplace and dictate behavior strictly within the scope of individual and family responsibility.
What I can do is clear: we slip away because of the slide towards censorship. Maxime realizes that Sánchez’s executive attributed his obsession with controlling the flow of information when it turns out to be compromised.
It is undeniable that social elites often contain inappropriate content or even teach criminal behavior, from child pornography to incitement to hatred and violence. It is a real problem that requires a regulatory approach.
But the focus must not be on users, but on public control of platforms. The goal should not be to prevent minors from entering it local digital, without guaranteeing that no criminals are operating in that location or illegal material is being distributed.
The solution is to regulate what operators can or cannot do and give parents the freedom to supervise their children.
The focus must be placed primarily on the transmitter and not on the user. It is not that a pedophile can attack our children, but that a pedophile cannot operate in a red social network under any circumstances.
Hi, It is imperative to approach platforms with the same accountability regime as traditional communication media.
If a periodical publishes defamation or incitement to criminal activity, it is subject to justice. In a similar way, some of the same social reds can be responsibility in the cascade and subject to possible sanctions.
There are now enough technological mechanisms to oversee access without compromising privacy. From data evaluation using facial biometrics to the European Digital Charter (EUDI) with selective disclosure, this technique enables identity and data verification in some form.
The state paper must be obligate platforms to provide parents with truly effective parental control mechanismsequipped with technical tools to autonomously decide what their children consume.
Anything that comes out of this focus will in any case be an effective measure, but with very limited effectiveness.
This sentiment, explicitly pointed out by Sánchez, turns out to be revelatory Elon Musk as the personification of all that needs to be narrowed down.
According to the argument maintained in the red soc
It is not for nothing that the government aims in the same way to protect minors, and the disturbing criticism of the “smell of hatred and polarization” directly points out that Sánchez is more interested in monitoring critical discourse and promoted as the first of the “ultra-internationals” in proposing effective regulation of digital platforms.
Leave a Reply