When the People’s Party began to denounce that the future extraordinary regularization of 500,000 immigrants was nothing more than a massive “papeles by papeletas” operation, the criticism was greatly exaggerated.
Of course, the legal challenges to obtaining citizenship are difficult, and the transfer of residence to the electoral census is far from automatic.
However, with the rhetorical escalation this weekend, radical members of Fr Pedro Sánchez (spurs of initiative, that) In a way, I advocate for PP’s interpretation.
Statements Podemos and Sumar ended to give people reason, as Alma Ezcurra, Isabel Díaz Ayuso or your own Feijoo they saw an incentive in the middle to create an act of gratitude that would change the electoral tally in the middle in favor of the progressive bloc.
At least the way he verbalized it Irene Montero in one day this Saturday: “We received the papers and now we are going to the nationality and the vote”.
How does what the government has presented as a humanitarian imperative fit into the contours of a calculated electoral engineering strategy.
In this sense, do not ignore the fact that 1.4 million foreigners received Spanish nationality (and therefore the right to vote) since Sánchez arrived in the country in 2018. This means that in 2027 one million more Spaniards will be able to vote than in 2023.
In any case, it is certain that the path to the ballot box for the regularized immigrant is complete.
Except for citizens of countries with respect to reciprocitycitizenship requires years of residency and bureaucracy that cannot be revived in the legislature.
It would therefore be premature to conclude that the outcome of the next general election will be irreversibly affected.
What is beyond doubt, however, is the replica political motivation underlying the regularization. This periodical advises you from the first moment of the royal decree plan I thought of it as a way to fuel polarization.
He sido Ion Belarra who made it clear, grotesquely boasting that “I’ll spend a whole week collecting these many tears of the day. I’m angry.”
If, at a time when the rest of Europe is leaning towards a more restrictive migration policy, the Spanish government decides to take the opposite path of mitigating the so-called effect, it is clear that it is not doing so out of conviction, without income.
The drug is designed to anger the right voters, as could be expected the general indignation among those who accepted the provocations of Podemos. And finally azuzar the growth of the right radical.
The cynical calculus of Moncloa dwells as it grows threat Vox, the easier it is for Sánchez to stand up in a single argument. This strategy of antagonism does not exist on our fronts.
Enter the trap Elon Muskwho called Montero “genocidal”, in a viral video in which he ensured that “it is clear that I want to emphasize again the racist and racist attitudes” of immigrants, must be sure that he will be lucky in Moncloa.
It is not for nothing that Sánchez did not lose the opportunity to respond to the tycoons and thus contrast the “humanity” of the Spanish model with the policy of “frontal walls” of the USA. Trump. To link regularization to disputes proposed by ICE, Sánchez can present himself as a global enemy of the “reactionary wave”.
The global impact video in which Montero appropriates and paradoxically alienates the theory of the great reemplaza (the method used by the extreme right to agitate the demonization of the immigrant) proves that we can play the game in Sánchez in his crispación strategy.
Overall, this is the definitive reason why the “progressive mayor” uses migration policy as a powerful weapon to infuriate the Spanish media. This is unbearable to instrumentalize such a serious assumption in such a vile and irresponsible manner.
Leave a Reply