It was in Huesca, in a rally, from where Pedro Sánchez he uttered a handful of words that didn’t cross the line of believability.
Analyzed one by one, in a literal way, we find a way to understand politics – and to understand politics in the same way – which we would consider to be the result of what we call “sanchism”.
Returning to this myth, I will resonate in the words of many of these other words with what Sánchez tried to justify the delay of the central government at the time of intervention in the country: “More action is needed [Mazón]que los pida”.
Both the nature of the autonomous state and the ineffectiveness of the ex-president of the Generality of Valencia threaten the central government with a moral obligation to intervene immediately.
Sánchez said people drowned in a bar that took days to get inside. There is no need to return to this widespread practice of psychoanalysis and conspiracy to understand the Prime Minister.
You just have to listen to them.
With 45 deaths in a rail accident whose investigation – led by a ministry-registered organization – reported infrastructure maintenance as the most likely cause, Sánchez was revealed with words of the same appearance.
Sánchez said: “This government has responded by putting victims at the center of its priorities, with empathy, efficiency, transparency and unity.”
At the same time, I added: “Today I recognize the Minister of Transport, Oscar Puentewho from the first moment of tragedy directs and gives to the dear’.
And a standing ovation. An unpleasant, disturbing and irritating standing ovation.
He was referring to the Minister of Transport when clarifying whether his leadership is directly related to one of the biggest rail disasters in Spanish history.
And then he said, “That’s the difference between one and the other. Unfortunately, tragedies happen in life, but that’s not the same as reacting to those tragedies.”
These two single sentences in the same sentence are undoubtedly the most disturbing.
For just five seconds, el war civility “one and the other” – seeing a dead man in his head, comparing money to a train because he is someone’s servant – and “tragedies happen”, said at the same time that the investigation is looking for more on infrastructure management.
If tragedies “happen”, it’s not another thing that absolves the government of any responsibility until time and daily information show otherwise.
Oscar Puenteone of the government’s most troubled and self-sabotaging ministers, came shortly after he rose to the exalted position of his president. He wrote on Twitter: “This week has been very difficult, so much so that we forget about it. For those who have to deal with something like this, it also helps us to feel good and happy. So I don’t want to accept this without saying THANK YOU for so much help and so much happiness.”
Where we translate politics! Social contract! Politics is the contract we sign to put government (our problems and much of our security) in the Executive for four years and through free elections.
How can you write this message and send it to society to live with the images of the accident and the pain of the victims? It depends how the minister feels now!
I imagine that within a few years there will be one of the study texts that will explain one of the great evils of today: sentimentalization politics. Unfortunately, egoism, victimism and emotional chanting enter the electorate. Although this question does not have many arguments. Just give the funeral home video of the death and report it to the front line. The Prime Minister and the Minister of Transport are not strangers.
This information is only the culmination of her interventions analyzed in their literalness. This mention of “empathy”, of “sacrifices in the middle”, does not agree with what was said later and cannot be reconciled with the deplantator at the religious ceremony in Huelva.
If one is tempted to define it as a simple analysis, one can refer to the words of Ayusa: I say that after that accident in the Madrid subway they would have called her an assassin in the Puerta del Sol.
With this magician, one can imagine this accident in another place with the sole purpose of political exploitation.
Los arguments de Arendt In the banalization of pain, the cases could be applied in variations to the accident of Adamuze with the paraphrase of the banalization of pain.
Scribe Churchill that words are the only things that last forever. “The most magnificent monuments or marvels of engineering are desmoroned by the hand of time”. But the words, no. The words always quedan ahí. On a phone call. Any day, any day. Above all, the risk of casualties.
Leave a Reply