As explained today in Spain, the future extraordinary regularization of immigrants keeps all faces converted to a coladero proper supervision.
According to the formula of the royal decree, the executive plans to grant legal residence to thousands of people based on it a requirement that undermines control logs: positive administrative silence applied to criminal antecedents.
If the country of origin does not submit prior confirmation within 30 days, the administration will assume that the attorney is net. A responsible statement from your immigrant will be enough to cover the expediency.
As it turns out, the Spanish state delegates public opinion to a person’s words based on this formula, there would be exactly an incentive to hide one’s past if it was a crime.
This lapse in rigor in criminal background checks leads to another common mistake: the omission of historical police requirements.
There seems to be a fundamental legal difference that this government is deliberately ignoring. While criminal precedent requires a signature judgment (a process that can take years in Spain and abroad), police antecedents reflect recidivism, arrests and the person’s actual behavior on the street.
Ignoring the political history behind Paraguay’s transfer of innocence is a dangerous interpretation of a law that prepares citizens. It is obvious that the state no one can get a legal residence permit for anyone who is detained by the police simply because the juice has not yet been glorified.
In this sense, regularization without looking at historical politics is in practice blocking many incidents.
Therefore, the emphasis that the People’s Party has defended is certainty: immigration must be legal, ordered and analyzed on a case-by-case basis.
This is not to deny the reality of thousands of people who work in the shadows and contribute to our economy. But the massive regularization of medium-sized expedientes en blanco It is based on a responsible migration policy.
Providing rights and legal certainty to those who are integrated is a humanitarian and economic imperative.
Y so EL ESPAÑOL repeats the regularization, but not in a different way, sacrificing legal guarantees on the altar of urgency and political convenience.
The key to Maduran migration policy is not the “what”, but the “how”. And the form in which this process will take place will determine whether Spain will strengthen its community structure or, on the contrary, deteriorate social cohesion and security.
The government cannot accept a model that allows it to reward foreigners who shirk their civic duties while punishing those who conscientiously indulge in crimes. It is audacious for a country to accept as valid its own responsibility individuals whose history is unknown.
Spain cannot afford to be a European anomaly which ignores the security standards of the Schengen area. And the responsibility for what can happen to regulated persons without control will lie squarely with the executive.
It should not be necessary to record the underlying legal valuation: regularization does notabula race. Integration requires transparency and mutual respect between the migrant and the receiving country.
No legalization is necessary without a certificate of successful political and criminal antecedents, issued by the competent authority and not by the mere will of the party concerned.
The government must meet a formula that combines justice towards the immigrant with the protection of the citizen’s security.
Leave a Reply