books
The podcast in ‘En la Sabana’ reflects the opinion of two lawyers and a writer in the debate that divides society and raises the issue of annulment.
Jose Bretonknown as the “Monster of Quemadillas”, he was sentenced in October 2011 to 40 years in prison asesino of his two children, aged two and six. Unable to accept that his wife wanted to be separated from him, he committed a horrific, cruel and cruel criminal sadist, abacando with children’s lives in a finca in Córdoba. He happened to be one of the greatest doctors of the last 50 years in Spain.
One year after the judgment of the Supreme Court, it returns to the center of the debate. Writer Luisgé Martin published ‘The Hate’, a book that seeks to explore the mind of a donkey. En el, Breton offers a never-before-seen confession which responded to injuries in society and sparked intense legal debate. Is this work an act of kindness and spite towards your own children? If so, should it be published? Is this a new attempt to hurt his former, only surviving victim? From a legal point of view Should freedom of expression and literary creation prevail over the desire to honor and intimidate minors?
In today’s chapter, we contact you with the opinion of Borja Adsuar Varelaabogado expert in the field of communication. “When in doubt, you have to be in favor of free speech; it exists precisely so that you can say what others may find offensive.”he claims. Even if you empathize with the pain of Ruth Ortiz, the children’s mother, consider this an editorial Anagram you must contact her before posting. No exact ones, remember: “We are not re-reading the crime we condemned, but a literary work about the case. Let’s look at the book first.”
on the other hand Altamira Gonzalolawyer, feminist activist and vice president of the Asociación Española de Feministas Socialistas, takes a characteristic stance. “If you use your freedom of speech to cause more pain to the victim, it will be fixed.”. For you, the publication of this book is “pure sadism, a macho exercise of power”. It further emphasizes the importance of social compromise in violence against gender violence.
Finally, Daniel Jimenezwriter and author of Accident (Seix Barral), defends the publication of the work by arguing that literature has explored the “approach to evil” throughout history in many examples.
The debate continues openly. Where should the creative freedom be in solving true crimes?
Leave a Reply