Bulos, ultraderecha y Angrois: 20 replica men paja de Óscar Puente

These victims suffer even more rhetoric than anything for one euro.

2. “The greatest guarantee is not to be misunderstood or hidden. If I make mistakes, but not bad ones, I have no intention of hiding anything”

Burying the truth under the tone of words is also a lie.

As an editorial in EL ESPAÑOL said on February 24, “what is the point when we forget the human factor, speed, lack of reversal and any governmental responsibility? According to the minister, we are facing ‘a much more complex problem’, ‘a problem that we are never vividly aware of in front of our red’. Secret, locked in mystery Churchill“.

3. “During the complete reconstruction of your house, all walls, columns and even windows should not be torn down, it depends on their condition”

When I “completely” renovate my house, I don’t tell my family that all the pipes have been changed since 1989. And when the old house comes back and the house floods, I don’t go on TV and say integral doesn’t mean total.

So, Minister, when you call her. Or in this case “carelessness with the domestic metaphor”.

4. “Do the deaths in the Angrois accident require the assistance of the Prime Minister? If not, we conclude that they are interested in the Criminal Code.”

En Angrois Murieron asked people because of the human error of operating the machine. In Adamuz, they died heart and soul for the infrastructure that PSOE managed and which we said was perfect.

Rajoy no comparison and that’s bad at this point. But at least Rajoy didn’t show up for the next few days. Usted turned verbal similes into art.

5. “I don’t have all the answers. If the weather is slowing down, compare the same day of the accident and tell me what I knew at this point.”

Nadie le pide todas las respuestas, minister. But like all minds.

The first day I said the street was “completely renovated”.

What was “inseparable”.

I read that “integral does not mean total”.

After that it was a “factory defect”.

Will the Acabarán quiz blame the soldier?

Minister, you will not need to supplement the answers over time. He changes the excuse after the pills.

6. “Criticism is one thing and planned disinformation is very different, a phenomenon historically linked to the rise of totalitarian regimes and which today responds to the unleashing of neo-fascism, which seeks to weaken coexistence, undermine trust in institutions and spread mud”

Minister, with all due respect: go ahead and wait with the expansion of the far right for whoever takes these rolls. Here you are covered and dead on the table and no one has left the other side. Much less la prena.

7. “They know about those involved in the political and media right. This is the game of the ultra-right, and regrettably in many cases the right.”

The fact that the “media controversy” corresponds exactly with the press that published the main revelations regarding the corruption of the government, the PSOE, the wife and the president’s husband, his former fiscal general and the minister of transport, do you not think it a coincidence?

So why does the “media controversy” work and is based on what to do, while the “progressive mainstream” seems to sleep in impropriety and discover nothing?

8. “I must understand that I thought about this initial debate about the presence or absence of Sánchez with certain expectations. It seems reasonable for the Minister to provide an explanation.”

The “Estupor” we experience when we come when Pedro Sánchez hides once more than a minister knowing that a blown fuse has been blown.

Sánchez sent them to the Senate as one sends his assistant to record a periodical under the rain. So Paiporta’s dog will now have to call her just like Senado’s dog.

9. “I want to realize that the government’s compromise with the announcement of the death is total. Those affected have an obligation to know the truth and thereby restore citizens’ trust in the railway line”

The government’s compromise with the “truth” is so total that infrastructure manager Adif has to publicly deny it.

Minister, don’t look for the truth. They held it as if it were a round wagon.

10. “Benefits amount to twenty thousand euros. If they are paid as a lump sum, they will be compatible with compulsory insurance and will be exempt from tax. We need to learn about the accidents that have happened, where some victims took a long time to receive compensation.”

216,000 for Spanish death. Allow me a bit of demagoguery to give you confidence in the politician inside me: with sixty-four dead Spaniards you could buy time David Broncano. With only your heart and six you would have to send it Grisons.

11. “I take risks and I’m sure I’ll make mistakes, but nobody’s evil. I have no intention of hiding anything”

Felicidadesi, you have managed to convince all the journalists of your mind of your good intentions, that there are so many who pretend not to know, but have failed to understand that putting your body on the line is very good in the arena, but it doesn’t take much for a politician, unless it is accompanied by reactions every day after an accident.

Not ten o’clock. Six days.

Of course, we still hoped to know the cause of the calendar for April 2025, for which days it does not seem like a long time.

12. “The Madrid-Seville high-speed line is not an abandoned or forgotten infrastructure. There will be no random decisions if it meets the technical criteria.”

This reaction will be perfectly valid if there are no warning documents from passengers, technicians, engineers and railway workers pointing out the risk.

A railway accident is not a meteorological phenomenon.

13. “I am aware that there are no words that adequately describe the pain that these tragedies cause, but they also allow us to assess society’s ability to respond, and ours was at the top. Among all the civil servants involved in the rescue processes, it was exemplary”

A very fraudulent return, Minister. “Attacarme a mí e atacar a los funcionadores que han respondedo de manera ejemplar el acción”.

Usted doesn’t attack them because he didn’t help collect corpses until his job before the accident. Mason should be dismissed for irresponsibility. Usted, he must resign as responsible.

14. “We’ve given ourselves ten days to do the work and get the infrastructure in place, but we’ll still be up in the air”

Mr. Minister, please tell us today and say that the circulation will be restored in a short time. Media España was disconnected by train every few days.

But everyone can rest easy because the minister is ‘donating expensive’. It is estimated that no such solutions.

15. “The accident of Frost occurs as a result of the demolition of the wall, caused by the weight of a certain thing due to the rains, which does not belong to the railway line. It is clear, it is neither Adif nor it is Renfe”.

That’s convenient. In Adamuz, the error is on the soldier’s side. En Gelida, the blame lies on the wall. At least no one resorted to suffering because of the climate.

Minister, you are responsible for transport. Everything that happens on the railway track is your responsibility.

Although the wall is not Adif, death is the responsibility of his ministry.

16. “After the accident, I took four steps. I also participated in ten interviews with the communication media. I will continue to work on this line.”

Of course. Many comments were on the last sentence of the interview with Silvia Intxaurrondowhere she brought him to ask her, frankly fascinated, how she endures a mountain of opposition and media opposition.

The last sentence of the interview was “así da gusto”.

We haven’t heard from you in the last few days. At usted, they were blanched.

17. “The sensors detect no relevant anomalies. The sensor is so small that it gives no warning about the circulatory system”

Make sure the sensors are not working.

Either this or the inversion in predictive maintenance applies.

We assume that the “world-class first” high-speed red light cannot detect the pre-mating pattern of four or five people. Minister, this is not red de primer level. It is a roulette wheel running at a speed of 300 km/h.

18. “I read and discovered authentic barbaridades because we are getting hundreds of thousands that should be implemented in the maintenance of our railway line to push the railway cars in other countries like Marruecos”

Madam Minister, nadie says they “got” money in Marruecos. The tenth thing is that while we are announcing millionaire twists on the AVE in Marrakech, here we have carriages from 1989.

No desvío de Fondos, Minister. It is a matter of priority.

But we want to talk about international cooperation and “projects” financed by the government for the last six years.

19. “Although sometimes I can rush to bring some information and then please correct me, I’d rather avoid it than the other way around”

Mr. Minister, “rushing” is deciphering 300 km/h when it was 280. “rushing” confuses Adamuze with Villa del Río.

But lying about the state of the road, changing the version five times and accusing someone of “bulos” is not hasty. It is bad faith. It’s incompetence.

Yen democracy, it pays by reduction. Don’t give too many directions to keep everything going as it was (except for Catalonia where they stopped, go ahead and you know why, with two medium costs).

20. “Train in Spain looking for success”

The view is.